05-20-2024, 03:07 AM
Thanks for the comments, Dave and Peter.
That arch at Red Stone Hills is a real problem. When you stand in front of it, you are immediately struck by the arch as the centre of interest. However, when you look at any resulting image, the arch is not at all prominent. I have taken many variations of this shot in the past without success! However, this time around, I decided to increase the size of the arch. Here the arch has been increased linearly by a factor of about 2 (i.e. takes up four times the image area of the original). However, the whole thing is somewhat over-processed, so I do not really like the picture.
regards - Pete
That arch at Red Stone Hills is a real problem. When you stand in front of it, you are immediately struck by the arch as the centre of interest. However, when you look at any resulting image, the arch is not at all prominent. I have taken many variations of this shot in the past without success! However, this time around, I decided to increase the size of the arch. Here the arch has been increased linearly by a factor of about 2 (i.e. takes up four times the image area of the original). However, the whole thing is somewhat over-processed, so I do not really like the picture.
regards - Pete