03-22-2023, 01:18 PM
Sorry, Dave, the name of the software is Dynamic Auto-Painter. I am still using the free version.
Dave, that is such a pretty pastel color. It looks so good with the soft OLIVE GREENS in the background. I like the patches of light areas too that look like they are a shade similar to that of the peachy rose. The colors are a the perfect combination.
I would have removed those TINY little specs in the flower's upper left side.
Please let me share with you my philosophy.
I watched a webinar last evening about Creative Photography and the presenter, Mollie Isaacs, said a very interesting thing about Painters and Photographers.
She said that Painters add things to their canvas to make the Painting better where Photographers must remove things from their photos to make the image better. Either you clone things out, like your tiny dots that do not contribute anything positive to the composition except ruin the appearance of a perfect rose, or you zoom in on the subject of your composition to remove unwanted distractions. I hope that I am not being too blunt.
There is a fellow at our club who took a great photo of the dirt road in front of his farm house in rural southern Michigan with snow baring trees on both sides of the road hanging over cedar plank stacked railed fences. It was a beautiful shot but it had a garbage pail over on one of the sides When asked why didn't you clone out the garbage pail, he responded that he wanted to make it look natural. The garbage pail was an eye-sore. No one would have missed it if it weren't there, but EVERYONE SAW THAT IT WAS THERE.
I know, or hope, that you don't mind my input. IT is a minor detail, but I noticed it immediately.
And let me finish by asking you this. If you were going to print this and hang it on a wall, would you leave in the tiny dots?
LORELL
Dave, that is such a pretty pastel color. It looks so good with the soft OLIVE GREENS in the background. I like the patches of light areas too that look like they are a shade similar to that of the peachy rose. The colors are a the perfect combination.
I would have removed those TINY little specs in the flower's upper left side.
Please let me share with you my philosophy.
I watched a webinar last evening about Creative Photography and the presenter, Mollie Isaacs, said a very interesting thing about Painters and Photographers.
She said that Painters add things to their canvas to make the Painting better where Photographers must remove things from their photos to make the image better. Either you clone things out, like your tiny dots that do not contribute anything positive to the composition except ruin the appearance of a perfect rose, or you zoom in on the subject of your composition to remove unwanted distractions. I hope that I am not being too blunt.
There is a fellow at our club who took a great photo of the dirt road in front of his farm house in rural southern Michigan with snow baring trees on both sides of the road hanging over cedar plank stacked railed fences. It was a beautiful shot but it had a garbage pail over on one of the sides When asked why didn't you clone out the garbage pail, he responded that he wanted to make it look natural. The garbage pail was an eye-sore. No one would have missed it if it weren't there, but EVERYONE SAW THAT IT WAS THERE.
I know, or hope, that you don't mind my input. IT is a minor detail, but I noticed it immediately.
And let me finish by asking you this. If you were going to print this and hang it on a wall, would you leave in the tiny dots?
LORELL